Posters by Dimitrios Meletis
https://www.meletis.at SYNTAGMATIC GRAPHETIC ALLOGRAPHY captures allographs that co-occur in sequ... more https://www.meletis.at SYNTAGMATIC GRAPHETIC ALLOGRAPHY captures allographs that co-occur in sequence in the context of the same inventory, be it a given person's handwriting (at a specific moment in time) or a given font such as 10 pt italic Times New Roman. For example, when a person writes the word <kitten> by hand, two graphs of the basic shape |t| are produced, and the same applies when the word is printed, as in <kitten>. In both cases, two instances of |t| occur. These two instances, as unique physical events, are concrete graphs and are syntagmatic variants of the same basic shape. They can be considered free allographs given that they can be replaced by each other, meaning the two instances of |t| in <kitten> might be switched. Note, however, that there might be effects of so-called coarticulation, especially in handwriting, as the forms of the preceding and following graphs and the graphomotoric movements of the hands and writing tools involved in producing them might affect the shape of the two instances of |t|, making them dependent on their specific position and, thus, visually variable and non-exchangeable.
Graphetics is the designation of a subdiscipline of the study of writing (which, following Neef 2... more Graphetics is the designation of a subdiscipline of the study of writing (which, following Neef 2015, I call grapholinguistics) dealing with all aspects concerning the formal and material aspects of writing (cf. Meletis 2015). Analogously to phonetics, it is further divided in the subbranches productional graphetics (studying writing processes), visual graphetics, and perceptual graphetics (studying recognition, reading, etc.).
To date, this subject has been predominantly excluded from linguistic theorizing because of the implicit general agreement among linguists that the specific shape and look of writing – with its varying features, e.g. font, type size, color, writing surface, etc. – do not contribute to the (denotative) meaning or generally, the linguistic structure of written utterances. It is the goal of this talk to prove the functions of the materiality of writing are manifold – and linguistically relevant.
The first part of the talk gives a brief outline of the most relevant historical conditions, obstacles, and milestones that are central to the development of graphetics within linguistics. As part of this historical reconstruction, definitions are presented, vocal advocates and their work are named, and key problems are compiled.
The second and key part then presents a descriptive graphetic model as a main concern of visual graphetics. Based on visual properties – especially blank spaces of different levels, e.g. word spaces, line breaks etc. – inherent in a variety of typologically different writing systems (e.g. German, Chinese, Arabic, and Thai), a number of descriptive graphetic units and levels is postulated and discussed.
Finally, a range of unresolved issues and desiderata are presented that ultimately serve as a means of incentive and orientation for future research in this area.
References
Meletis, Dimitrios (2015): Graphetik: Form und Materialität von Schrift (= Typo|Druck). Glückstadt: Werner Hülsbusch.
Neef, Martin (2015): Writing systems as modular objects: proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics 1, 708–721.
Uploads
Posters by Dimitrios Meletis
To date, this subject has been predominantly excluded from linguistic theorizing because of the implicit general agreement among linguists that the specific shape and look of writing – with its varying features, e.g. font, type size, color, writing surface, etc. – do not contribute to the (denotative) meaning or generally, the linguistic structure of written utterances. It is the goal of this talk to prove the functions of the materiality of writing are manifold – and linguistically relevant.
The first part of the talk gives a brief outline of the most relevant historical conditions, obstacles, and milestones that are central to the development of graphetics within linguistics. As part of this historical reconstruction, definitions are presented, vocal advocates and their work are named, and key problems are compiled.
The second and key part then presents a descriptive graphetic model as a main concern of visual graphetics. Based on visual properties – especially blank spaces of different levels, e.g. word spaces, line breaks etc. – inherent in a variety of typologically different writing systems (e.g. German, Chinese, Arabic, and Thai), a number of descriptive graphetic units and levels is postulated and discussed.
Finally, a range of unresolved issues and desiderata are presented that ultimately serve as a means of incentive and orientation for future research in this area.
References
Meletis, Dimitrios (2015): Graphetik: Form und Materialität von Schrift (= Typo|Druck). Glückstadt: Werner Hülsbusch.
Neef, Martin (2015): Writing systems as modular objects: proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics 1, 708–721.